<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Masters Conference 2008: Search Terms and Financial Banking Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ediscoveryinfo.com/2008/10/16/masters-search-terms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ediscoveryinfo.com/2008/10/16/masters-search-terms/</link>
	<description>Electronic Discovery in the News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Masters Conference 2008: Search Terms and Financial Banking &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ediscoveryinfo.com/2008/10/16/masters-search-terms/comment-page-1/#comment-4564</link>
		<dc:creator>The Masters Conference 2008: Search Terms and Financial Banking &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ediscoveryinfo.com/2008/10/16/the-masters-conference-2008-search-terms-and-financial-banking-services/#comment-4564</guid>
		<description>[...] Next up was a panel entitled “Trends of the Financial Banking Services Sector” with Linda Riefberg from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and Laura Zubulake herself from the infamous e-discovery opinions. &#8230;   Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next up was a panel entitled “Trends of the Financial Banking Services Sector” with Linda Riefberg from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and Laura Zubulake herself from the infamous e-discovery opinions. &#8230;   Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.ediscoveryinfo.com/2008/10/16/masters-search-terms/comment-page-1/#comment-4464</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ediscoveryinfo.com/2008/10/16/the-masters-conference-2008-search-terms-and-financial-banking-services/#comment-4464</guid>
		<description>Excellent overview.  To the comment &quot;One panelist lamented that corporate attorneys are sometimes pushed into using specific technology tools from the company’s IT department and those tools may not always be the best from a legal standpoint,&quot;, I might suggest that based on the fact that very few EDD vendors have a third generation electronic discovery offering (designed for EDD, designed with application to application intergration vs. platform to platform level intergration) that SaaS model services may be the best approach by IT + Legal Teams as SaaS it allows for the delivery of EDD services without the requirement for investment in hardware/software and maintenance resources. Using this approach - IT+Legal Teams may be able to reconcile needs with services that are beneficial for both - without sacrificing any functionality (and actually gaining integration benefits such as efficiency in processing and less &quot;transfer of data&quot; between platforms).   Additionally, some of the SaaS model services are considerably less expensive than non-SaaS based offerings - not the first point of consideration in chosing a vendor - but one that very much influences the decision.

Thanks for sharing the panel overview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent overview.  To the comment &#8220;One panelist lamented that corporate attorneys are sometimes pushed into using specific technology tools from the company’s IT department and those tools may not always be the best from a legal standpoint,&#8221;, I might suggest that based on the fact that very few EDD vendors have a third generation electronic discovery offering (designed for EDD, designed with application to application intergration vs. platform to platform level intergration) that SaaS model services may be the best approach by IT + Legal Teams as SaaS it allows for the delivery of EDD services without the requirement for investment in hardware/software and maintenance resources. Using this approach &#8211; IT+Legal Teams may be able to reconcile needs with services that are beneficial for both &#8211; without sacrificing any functionality (and actually gaining integration benefits such as efficiency in processing and less &#8220;transfer of data&#8221; between platforms).   Additionally, some of the SaaS model services are considerably less expensive than non-SaaS based offerings &#8211; not the first point of consideration in chosing a vendor &#8211; but one that very much influences the decision.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing the panel overview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

